Morphological analysis of Sanskrit derivation based on word schemes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24201/clecm.v7i0.144Keywords:
derivación, sánscrito, esquemas de palabras, correspondencia morfológicaAbstract
Usually, Sanskrit derivation description consists of rules of segmentation and concatenation according to the model of morphological analysis based on morphemes. However, there are certain patterns in which the relationships between the form and the meaning of the theoretically segmented subunits are not satisfactorily analyzed. Given this problem, an analysis model based on word schemes is applied to perform a partial and approximate morphological analysis of the Sanskrit lexicon. The word schemes outline bipartite morphological correspondences (derivation processes). The most relevant achievement is a homogeneous list that represents the establishment of natural morphological relationships that from the perspective based on morphemes are left aside. It is concluded that the derivation in Sanskrit is thus an empirical study, effective and intuitive, that benefits from a functional perspective based on use.
Downloads
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Londres: Cambridge University Press.
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Massachussets: M.I.T. Press.
Bauer, Laurie. 1988. Introducing linguistic morphology. Bristol: Edinburgh University Press.
Bazell, Charles E. 1949. On the problem of the morpheme. Archivum Linguisticum 1. En Francis Katamba (ed.) Morphology Critical Concepts in Linguistics: Word Structure: a Variety of Views, 2004, Vol. 1, 1-15. Londres/ NuevaYork: Routledge.
Blevins, James P. 2013. Word-based morphology from Aristotle to modern WP (Word and Paradigm models). En Keith Allan (ed.) Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics, 375-395. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. Londres: George Allen & Unwin.
Bochner, Harry. 1993. Simplicity in generative morphology. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyer.
Booij, Geert. 2015. Word-formation in construction grammar. En Peter O. Müller, Ongebor Ohnheiser y Susan Olsen (eds.) An International handbook of the languages of Europe (Vol. 1), 188-201. Berlín / Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Booij, Geert, 2010. Construction morphology. NuevaYork: Oxford University Press.
Booij, Geert. 2005. The Grammar of words. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Cardona, George. 1997. Pāṇini, his work and its traditions, Vol. I: Background and Introduction (2da. Ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan D. 2008. Lingüística cognitiva, Antonio Benítez Burraco (trad.). Madrid: Akal Ediciones.
Das, Karunasindhu. 1990. A Pāṇinian approach to philosophy of language. Calcuta: Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar.
Gillon, Brendan. 1991. Sanskrit word formation and context free rules. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics Vol. 11, 1-21.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2007. Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. En Vyvyan Evans; Bergen, Benjamin & Jörg Zingen (eds.) The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, 589-600. Londres/ Oakville: Equinox.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1). 31-80.
Haspelmath, Martin & Sims, Andrea D. 2010. Understanding morphology. Londres: Hodder Education.
Hernández Quiroz, Anselmo. 2018. Formación de palabras en sánscrito: Análisis morfológico basado en esquemas de palabras. Ciudad de México: UNAM. (Tesis de doctorado).
Hockett, Charles F. 1947. Problems of morphemic analysis. Language, Núm. 23. En Francis Katamba (ed). Morphology: Critical concepts in linguistics, Word Structure: a Variety of Views, 2004, Vol. 1, 321-343. Londres/ Nueva York: Routledge.
Katamba, Francis & Stonham, John. 2006. Morphology. Nueva York: Palgrave / McMillan.
Katre, Sumitra. 1987. The Aṣṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini. Austin: Texas University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2013. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2010. Cognitive grammar. En Bernd Heine y Heiko Narrog (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 87-109. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. I Theoretical Prerequisites) California: Stanford University Press.
Monier-Williams, Monier. 2005 [1899]. A Sanskrit-English Dictionary (3a. reimp.). Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications [Oxford: Clarendon Press].
Nida, Eugene A. 1948. The identification of morphemes. Language. Citado en Katamba, Francis (ed.). Morphology Critical Concepts in Linguistics: Word Structure: a Variety of Views, 2004, Vol. 1, 414-441. Londres/ Nueva York: Routledge.
Neuvel, Sylvain. 2003. Metamorphology: A Word-based account of polysinthesis and other multivalent morphological relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago. (Tesis de Doctorado).
Neuvel, Sylvain & Singh, Rajendra. 2002. Vive la difference! What morphology is about. Folia Linguistica 35, 3-4.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1980. El primer cuarto de siglo de la gramática generativa-transformatoria (1955-1980) [Linguistic Theory in America: The First Quarter-Century of Transformational Grammar].González Higueras, José Javier; Martínez Jiménez, José Antonio & Muñoz Marquina, Francisco (trads.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign based morphology and phonology: With special attention to optimality theory. California: University of Berkeley. (Tesis de doctorado).
Rangarajan, G. 1999. Word-formation in Sanskrit: With special reference to taddhita-formation. Delhi: Sharada Publishing House.
Saeed, John. 1999. Somali. Londres: John Benjamins.
Singh, Rajendra & Ford, Alan. 2000. In praise of Sakatayan: Some remarks on whole word morphology. The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Singh, Rajendra & Agnihotri, Rama Kant. 1997. Hindi morphology: A word-based description. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Subramania Iyer, K. A. (trad.). 1971. The vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari (Chapter III, Part 1). Puna: Deccan College.
Taylor, John R. 2015. Word-formation in cognitive grammar. En Müller, Peter O.; Ohnheiser, Ongebor & Susan Olsen (eds.). Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe. Vol. 1, 145–158. Berlín / Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taylor, John R. 2002. Cognitive grammar. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Whitney, William Dwight. [1879] 1950. A Sanskrit grammar: Including both the classical language, and the older dialects, of Veda and Brahmana. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zacarías Ponce de León, Ramón F. 2016. Rivalidad entre esquemas de formación de palabras. Ciudad de México: Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas/UNAM.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright of their work and are free to disseminate it, make copies for any use, and/or deposit in any repository or archive of their choice, but they grant Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México the right to publish the work for the first time. Authors agree to acknowledge Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México as the site of original publication of their article / note / review through proper citation.
Articles appearing in Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México are made available to readers under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
